The Dynamics of Imkan ar-Rukyat Criteria in Indonesia: Comparing Muhammad Mansur's Thought in Kitab Mizan al-I'tidal with the Neo-MABIMS Criteria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47766/astroislamica.v5i1.5065Keywords:
Imkan ar-rukyat, Neo-MABIMS, Mizan al-I'tidal, Muhammad Mansur, Crescent visibilityAbstract
Crucial differences in determining the beginning of the Hijri months, such as Ramadan, Shawwal, and Dhu al-Hijjah in Indonesia, are often triggered by a methodological dichotomy among Islamic organizations. This divergence is distinctly evident between the rukyat (lunar observation) method guided by Nahdlatul Ulama and the hisab (astronomical calculation) method adopted by Muhammadiyah. As an integrative solution, the concept of imkan ar-rukyat (possibility of sighting) emerges to bridge these two approaches through scientific lunar visibility criteria. Based on this reality, this study aims to conduct an in-depth examination of the dynamics of the imkan ar-rukyat criteria in Indonesia by comparing Muhammad Mansur's thoughts in the Kitab Mizan al-I'tidal with the neo-MABIMS criteria. This research employs a library research method utilizing a historical-comparative approach and descriptive analysis techniques. Primary data were extracted from the Kitab Mizan al-I'tidal, while secondary data were sourced from official MABIMS policy documents and Ministry of Religious Affairs regulations. The results reveal that Muhammad Mansur strongly rejected the rigid establishment of a lunar altitude threshold, such as at 7 degrees. Instead, he viewed imkan al-ru'yah as a dynamic and naturalistic concept grounded in continuous empirical observation, evidenced by testimonies of lunar sightings below 7° in various regions of Java. This dynamic paradigm aligns with the adaptive nature of the MABIMS criteria, which evolved from the old standard (altitude 2°, elongation 3°, moon age 8 hours) to the neo-MABIMS criteria (altitude 3° and elongation 6.4°) implemented since 2022. The government, through the Ministry of Religious Affairs, optimizes these criteria as a unifying instrument for the Muslim community. In conclusion, there is a paradigmatic continuity between the Nusantara astronomical turats (heritage) and contemporary criteria, affirming that lunar visibility standards remain open to revision in line with advancements in science and technology.
References
Aini, Shofwatul. “A Discourse of Mabims New Criteria: Reading Difference Frequency Between Wujud Al-Hilal and Imkan Ar-Rukyat.” Justicia Islamica 19, no. 1 (June 28, 2022): 113–31. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v19i1.3394.
Amrin, Muhammad Dwi Fajri, Eman Suherman, Mas’udatul Fitriyah, and Ishma Amelia. “Reconceptualizing Islamic Calendar Determination.” Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum 11, no. 1 (May 4, 2026): 67–84. https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v11i1.11345.
Arifin, Jaenal. “Fiqih Hisab Rukyah Di Indonesia ( Telaah Sistem Penetapan Awal Bulan Qamariyyah ).” Yudisia Vol5,No2, no. Disember (2014): 402–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21043/YUDISIA.V5I2.704.
Azhari, Susiknan. “Neo-Visibilitas Hilal MABIMS: Antara Idealita Dan Realita.” Times.ID, 2022.
Faid, Muhamad Syazwan, Mohd Saiful Anwar Mohd Nawawi (Corresponding Author), Mohd Hafiz Mohd Saadon, Nazhatulshima Ahmad, and Aizan Ali @ Mat Zin. “Islamic Historical Review on Middle Age Lunar Crescent Visibility Criterion.” Journal of Al-Tamaddun 17, no. 1 (June 30, 2022): 109–25. https://doi.org/10.22452/JAT.vol17no1.9.
Fatmawati, Azizah. “Implementasi Taqwim Standar Indonesia Sebagai Pemersatu Kalender Masyarakat Indonesia.” AL - AFAQ : Jurnal Ilmu Falak Dan Astronomi 4, no. 2 (December 11, 2022): 157–80. https://doi.org/10.20414/afaq.v4i2.4166.
Helim, Abdul. “Hamka’s Legal Methodology on Hisab–Ru’yah in His Book ‘Saya Kembali Ke Ru’yah.’” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 23, no. 2 (July 12, 2024): 215. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v23i2.11952.
Hendri, Hendri, Fajrul Wadi, Saiful Amin, Andriyaldi Andriyaldi, and Fahmil Samiran. “Tokoh Falak Minangkabau (Studi Pemikiran Saadoeddin Djambek Dan Tahir Jalaluddin).” Islam Transformatif : Journal of Islamic Studies 3, no. 1 (2019): 89. https://doi.org/10.30983/it.v3i1.1157.
Ilhami, La, and Zul Efendi. “Proporsionalitas Dalam Hisab: Pembacaan Terhadap Fatwa Yusuf Al-Qaradhawi.” Astroislamica: Journal of Islamic Astronomy 4, no. 1 (June 1, 2025): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.47766/ASTROISLAMICA.V4I1.3350.
Ismail, Ismail, Ikhsan Kamilan Latif, and Indah Sari. “Reconstructing the Concept of Hilal Matlaʿ in Determining the Beginning of the Hijri Month : A Jurisprudential Perspective.” Al-Mizan: Jurnal Hukum Ismal Dan Ekonomi Syariah 13, no. 1 (2026): 29–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54621/jiam.v13i1.1203.
Khalil Mubarraq, Muhammad, Ismail Ismail, and Laiyina Ukhti. “Pluralisme Hukum Dalam Penentuan Ramadan: Otoritas Kitab Matla’ul Badrayn Sebagai Living Law Di Masyarakat Indonesia.” QISTHOSIA : Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 7, no. 1 (June 30, 2026): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.46870/JHKI.V7I1.2121.
Manzil, Li’izza Diana. “Korelasi Historisitas Ilmu Hisab Rukyat Dengan Perkembangan Peradaban Islam.” Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam 3, no. 2 (December 29, 2018): 185. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v3i2.432.
Maskufa, Maskufa, Sopa Sopa, Sri Hidayati, and Adi Damanhuri. “Implementation of the New MABIMS Crescent Visibility Criteria: Efforts to Unite the Hijriyah Calendar in the Southeast Asian Region.” AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 22, no. 1 (June 30, 2022). https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v22i1.22275.
Mohd Nawawi, Mohd Saiful Anwar, Muhamad Syazwan Faid, Mohd Hafiz Mohd Saadon, Raihana Abdul Wahab, and Nazhatulshima Ahmad. “Hijri Month Determination in Southeast Asia: An Illustration Between Religion, Science, and Cultural Background.” Heliyon 10, no. 20 (October 2024): e38668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38668.
Mohd Nawawi, Mohd Saiful Anwar, Khairussaadah Wahid, Saadan Man, Nazhatulshima Ahmad, and Mohammaddin Abdul Niri. “Pemikiran Imam Taqi Al-Din Al-Subki (683/1284-756/1355) Berkaitan Kriteria Kenampakan Anak Bulan.” Jurnal Syariah 28, no. 1 (April 30, 2020): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.22452/js.vol28no1.1.
Muh. Arif Royyani, Abdul Mufid, M. Ihtirozun Ni’am, Alfian Qodri Azizi, and Achmad Azis Abidin. “Shahadah ’Ilmy; Integrating Fiqh and Astronomy Paradigm in Determining The Arrival of Lunar Months in Indonesia.” AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 16, no. 2 (January 4, 2022): 503–24. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v16i2.5320.
Mulyadi, Achmad, Sharia Faculty, and Iain Madura. “Non-Astronomical Aspects of the Success of Rukyatul Hilal in East Java.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 8, no. 3 (November 16, 2024): 1859–80. https://doi.org/10.22373/SJHK.V8I3.25258.
Muslim, Pepep Puad, Tatang Farhanul Hakim, and Suparman Jassin. “Dinamika Dan Perkembangan Ilmu Falak Dari Era Pra Islam Hingga Era Kontemporer.” Al-Tsaqafa : Jurnal Ilmiah Peradaban Islam 20, no. 1 (July 17, 2023): 14–28. https://doi.org/10.15575/al-tsaqafa.v20i1.27243.
Taufik Maulana, Sitti Mawar, and Riza Afrian Mustaqim. “Kontroversi Kesaksian Rukyat Hilal Non-Lokal Di Aceh: Tinjauan Yuridis Empiris Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Syar’iyah Jantho.” As-Siyadah 6, no. 1 (March 2, 2026): 129–43. https://doi.org/10.22373/as-siyadah.v6i1.8354.
Taufiqurachman, Taufiqurachman, Wilda Nurmadhan, Bilat Nur Islami, Ath Thaariq Nurul Fatah, and Annisa Azzahra. “Analisis Perbandingan Antara Metode Hisab Dan Rukyat Dalam Menentukan Awal Bulan Ramadhan Di Indonesia.” JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan 7, no. 11 (November 1, 2024): 12473–81. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v7i11.6203.
Ulum, Miftahul. “Fatwa Ulama NU (Nahdlatul Ulama) Dan Muhammadiyah Jawa Timur Tentang Hisab Rukyat.” Jurnal Keislaman 1, no. 2 (October 28, 2021): 244–72. https://doi.org/10.54298/jk.v1i2.3369.
Yaqin, Ahmad Ainul. “Pemikiran Imkān Al-Rukyah Ahmad Marzuqi Al-Batāwi Dalam Kitab Faḍlu Al-Raḥman.” Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo, 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Roihan Dliyaul Haq, Ahmad Adib Rofiuddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
