Pemahaman Guru dalam Penskoran Tes Bentuk Pilihan Ganda dan Uraian pada Pembelajaran PAI di MTsS Azzanjabil Bireuen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47766/pase.v3i1.2442Keywords:
Educational Evaluation, Essay Test, Islamic Religious Education, Multiple Choice, Test ScoringAbstract
In the context of Islamic Religious Education (IRE), accurate scoring techniques not only reflect students’ cognitive achievement but also support character development and the internalization of spiritual values. This study aims to explore in depth the understanding of IRE teachers regarding scoring techniques for multiple-choice and essay-type tests, as well as their implications for the learning process at MTsS Azzanjabil in Bireuen District. The research employs a descriptive qualitative approach, with data collected through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. Data analysis follows the model of Miles, Huberman & Saldaña (2014), which includes data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing/verification. The findings reveal that teachers still rely on conventional scoring methods for multiple-choice tests, assigning fixed scores without weighting or correction for guessing. In contrast, for essay-type tests, teachers demonstrate a more nuanced understanding by considering the difficulty level of questions and the quality of student responses. The scoring practices have shown a positive impact on students’ learning motivation, although they are not yet fully supported by standardized scoring guidelines or rubrics. Teachers’ understanding of scoring techniques has significant implications for the quality of evaluation and the overall learning process in IRE. Strengthening teacher competence through training and the development of structured scoring guidelines is essential to ensure that assessments are conducted more objectively, proportionally, and in alignment with the values of Islamic education.
References
Achmad, G., & Prastowo, A. (2022). Authentic Assessment Techniques on Cognitive Aspects in Islamic Religious Education Learning at Elementary School Level. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v6i1.42636.
Alvizar, A. (2023). Implementasi Penilaian Otentik Sikap dalam Kurikulum Ismuba. TARLIM: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM, 6(2), 111-122. https://ejurnal.unmuhjember.ac.id/index.php/TARLIM/article/view/805/276.
Arikunto, S. (2022). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Sudijono, A. (2011). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Agustianti, R., Abyadati, S., Nussifera, L., Irvani, A. I., Handayani, D. Y., Hamdani, D., & Amarulloh, R. R. (2022). Asesmen Dan Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Tohar Media.
Atika, Y., Rahmaniar, Y., Wanto, D., Daheri, M., & Abdigermas, J. (2023). Formative Test Analysis of Islamic Religious Education Learning Evaluation Practices (Study at SMP Negeri 1 Muara Kemumu). Indonesian Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.58723/ijopate.v1i2.113.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of. Educational Objectives, 250. https://publicservicesalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/guildresearch_blooms2013.pdf.
Brookhart, S. M., & McMillan, J. H. (2020). Classroom Assessment and Educational Measurement (p. 296). Taylor & Francis.
Carless, D. (2014). Exploring Learning-Oriented Assessment Processes. Higher Education, 69, 963 - 976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9816-z.
Faniyi, A. (2023). Enhancing Student Academic Performance through Educational Testing and Measurement. Edumania-An International Multidisciplinary Journal. https://doi.org/10.59231/edumania/8981.
Fauzi, A., & Inayati, N. (2023). Implementasi Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Al Islam di Sekolah Menengah Atas Muhammadiyah. Munaddhomah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v4i2.438.
Ghaicha, A. (2016). Theoretical Framework for Educational Assessment: A Synoptic Review. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(24), 212-231. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1112912.pdf
Handoyono, N. A., & Arifin, Z. (2016). Pengaruh Inquiry Learning dan Problem-Based Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar PKKR Ditinjau dari Motivasi Belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 6(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v6i1.8114
Herwin, H., Pristiwaluyo, T., & Dahalan, S. (2022). Do Scoring Techniques and Number of Choices Affect the Reliability of Multiple-choice Tests in Elementary Schools? Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i4.7149.
Hidayat, T., & Asyafah, A. (2019). Konsep Dasar Evaluasi dan Implikasinya dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah. Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. https://doi.org/10.24042/atjpi.v10i1.3729.
Hu, W., Dillon, H., & Wilkinson, T. (2022). Educators as Judges: Applying Judicial Decision-Making Principles to High-Stakes Education Assessment Decisions. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 35, 168 - 179. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2022.2038176.
Magdalena, I., Aqmarani, A., Nurhalisa, N., & Syahra, N. (2023). Perbandingan Penggunaan Tes Objektif dan Tes Subjektif terhadap Hasil Belajar. YASIN. https://doi.org/10.58578/yasin.v3i4.1316.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook (3rd Edition). SAGE Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Miller, L., & Linn, R. L. Gronlund. (2009). Measurement and Assessment in Teaching.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.
Sakban, W., Nurmawati, N., & Haidir, H. (2023). An Analysis of Tests Designed by Islamic Education Teachers Based on Higher-Order Thinking Skills. JURNAL TARBIYAH. https://doi.org/10.30829/tar.v30i2.3117.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. CV. Alfabeta.
Supardi, U. S. (2015). Peran Berpikir Kreatif dalam Proses Pembelajaran Matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 2(3). https://www.journal.lppmunindra.ac.id/index.php/Formatif/article/view/107.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Asraddin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




