Curriculum Relevance, Stakeholder Engagement, and Graduate Employability in Islamic Higher Education: Evidence from the KPI Graduate Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47766/itqan.v17i1.7370Keywords:
Curriculum Relevance, Graduate Employability, Stakeholder EngagementAbstract
Curriculum relevance has become a key indicator of higher education quality because it determines how well graduate competencies respond to workforce demands and stakeholder expectations. This study aims to assess the relevance of the Postgraduate Program in Islamic Communication and Broadcasting (KPI) curriculum at IAIN Lhokseumawe from the perspectives of alumni and institutional stakeholders. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed, involving twelve alumni and representatives from government institutions, schools, media organizations, communication agencies, and zakat institutions. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, observations, and document analysis, and analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña. The findings indicate that the curriculum remains relevant in fostering ethical awareness, interpersonal communication, collaboration, and community engagement. However, competencies related to analytical thinking, strategic communication, digital literacy, policy analysis, and continuous professional development require further strengthening to meet evolving labour market demands. Stakeholders emphasized the importance of closer collaboration between universities and professional sectors to ensure continuous curriculum improvement. Based on these findings, this study proposes a Transformative Curriculum Framework integrating labour market foresight, competency-based curriculum, experiential learning, Islamic values and local wisdom, and sustainable stakeholder partnerships. The framework provides a context-sensitive model for strengthening curriculum relevance, graduate employability, and stakeholder value within Islamic higher education.
Downloads
References
Aziz, A. (2019). Komunikasi Islam di Era Digital: Etika, Dakwah, dan Media Baru. Jakarta: Kencana.
Baidowi, A., Mujahidin, I., & Riadi, A. (2023). Strategi Pengembangan Program Studi Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam Melalui Inovasi Kurikulum. Syiar: Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam, 3(2), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.54150/syiar.v3i2.270.
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (4th ed.). Open University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186.
Faramadina, D. A., & Fadjar, N. S. (2022). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pengangguran Terdidik Lulusan Perguruan Tinggi Jawa Timur. Contemporary Studies in Economic, Finance and Banking, 1(4), 557-570. https://doi.org/10.21776/csefb.2022.01.4.02.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher Education and Its Communities: Interconnections, Interdependencies and a Research Agenda. Higher Education, 56(3), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9128-2.
Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Marginson, S. (2016). Higher Education and the Common Good. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Moriarty, L. (2024). Optimising the Employability of Product Design Graduates Through Co-Design (Doctoral dissertation, Leeds Beckett University). https://doi.org/10.25448/lbu.29469185.
OECD. (2019). OECD Skills Outlook 2019: Thriving in a Digital World. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/df80bc12-en.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Salabi, A. S., Prasetyo, M. A. M., Halil, H., & Maulina, M. (2024). Effectiveness of the Islamic Education Management Study Program Using Alumni Tracer Study Data. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 12(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.21831/jamp.v12i2.71426.
Sandelowski, M. (2001). Real Qualitative Researchers Do Not Count: The Use of Numbers in Qualitative Research. Research in Nursing & Health, 24(3), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.1025.
Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-based Education: Critical Issues and Answers. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
World Bank. (2020). Indonesia Economic Prospects: The Long Road to Recovery. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1608-3.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kamaruzzaman Kamaruzzaman, Linur Ficca Agustina, Muhammad Saleh, Harjoni Desky
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
