Reconstruction of The Values of “Kato Nan Ampek” as an Ethical Pedagogy in Language Learning: Philosophy of Education and values Education

Mona Putri Maharani; Silvia Marni; Wiranti Gusman; Nella Novianda; Syahri Ramadhona; Suhailee Sohnui

Authors

Mona Putri Maharani Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4122-2012
Silvia Marni Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6554-1399
Wiranti Gusman Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1518-512X
Nella Novianda Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1361-2298
Syahri Ramadhona Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0473-3322
Suhailee Sohnui Ciang Mai University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4912-6283

Keywords:

Kato Nan Ampek, value education, Ethical Pedagogy

Abstract

This study aims to reconstruct the values contained in Kato Nan Ampek as an ethical pedagogy in language learning through an examination of the philosophy of education and values education. The object of this study is the values contained in Kato Nan Ampek as the foundation of ethical pedagogy in language learning. This study employs a qualitative approach using library research. This study focuses on the examination, interpretation, and synthesis of various theoretical ideas related to Kato Nan Ampek. The data sources for this study consist of primary and secondary data. Primary data are derived from books, scientific journal articles, and related research findings. Secondary data comes from theses, dissertations, conference proceedings, encyclopedias, and policy documents related to the focus of the study. The results of this literature review indicate that Kato Nan Ampek can be reconstructed as an ethical pedagogy in language learning. Kato Nan Ampek embodies educational values relevant to the needs of language learning. The values contained in Kato Nan Ampek—including respect, empathy, wisdom, and moral responsibility—can be integrated into language learning in schools

References

Arsyad, H., & Sauri, S. (2024). Landasan Filosofi Pendidikan dan Konsep Mendidik. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 9(3), 1585–1596.

Dewantara, K. H. (1977). Karya Ki Hadjar Dewantara: Bagian pertama pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Majelis Luhur Persatuan Taman Siswa.

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: Macmillan.

Fikri, I., & Hanafi. (2023). Etika Bahasa Kato Nan Ampek dalam Adat Minangkabau. Paradigma: Jurnal Kalam dan Filsafat, 5(1), 58–72.

Freire, P. (2005). Pendidikan kaum tertindas (Terjemahan Utomo Dananjaya). Jakarta: LP3ES.

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Gustin, I. S., & Hasaniyah, N. (2025). Kato Nan Ampek: Seni Berbicara dan Etika Menghargai dalam Budaya Minangkabau. Maliki Interdisciplinary Journal, 3(2), 397–401.

Hendra, T. (2024). Kato Nan Ampek Sebagai Bentuk Representatif Komunikasi Dakwah Berbasis Kearifan Budaya Lokal Perspektif Budaya Minangkabau. HIKMAH, 18(2), 253–266.

Hendrizal, dkk. 2022. Kato Nan Ampek Sebagai Landasan Filsafat Etika di Minangkabau. Gema Ekonomi. Gema Ekonomi, 11 (5): 1229.

Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and Moral Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Husni, M. 2024. Sistem Etika Minangkabau: Relasi Adat, Islam dan Kebangsaan (Disertasi Doctoral Perngkajian Islam, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta) https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/123456789/84745

Lucardo, W., dkk. 2024. Internalisasi Pendidikan Karakter dalam Mata Pelajaran Budaya Alam Minangkabau di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(1), 989-987.

Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development: The psychology of moral development (Vol. 2). San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Lickona, T. (2013). Educating for character: Mendidik untuk membentuk karakter. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for Character. New York: Bantam Books.

Lubis, M. (2009). Pendidikan Nilai dan Moral. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Marni, Silvia. Pelestarian Bahasa Minangkabau sebagai Pembentuk Pribadi yang Santun,. Sumatra Barat: STKIP PGRI Sumbar, 2013.

Navis, A. A. (1984). Alam takambang jadi guru: Adat dan kebudayaan Minangkabau. Jakarta: Grafiti Pers.

Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Oktavianus. (2013). Bahasa dan Budaya Minangkabau. Padang: Universitas Andalas Press.

Reihan, Muhammad., Gusnetti., Wanda Maharani., dan Zahran Ulima. 2023. Etika Kato Nan Ampek dalam Budaya Minangkabau sebagai Pedoman dalam Berkomunikasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Langue and Parole, 7(7): 64-69.

Revita. (2013). Pragmatik dan Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Budaya Minangkabau. Padang: Universitas Andalas.

Saputri, D. R., dkk. (2024). Filosofi Pendidikan Indonesia dalam Perspektif Ki Hadjar Dewantara dan Relevansinya dengan Pendidikan Profesi Guru. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Srisaparmi, & Fitrisia, A. (2024). Nilai Filsafat Kato Nan Ampek dalam Komunikasi Masyarakat Minangkabau. Journal of Education Research, 5(2), 1817–1822.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tilaar, H. A. R. (2015). Pedagogik teoretis untuk Indonesia. Jakarta: Kompas.

Tomlinson, J., & Little, V. (2005). A code of the ethical principles underlying teaching as a professional activity. In R. Gardner, J. Cairns, & D. Lawton (Eds.), Education for values: Morals, ethics and citizenship in contemporary teaching. RoutledgeFalmer.

Yuberta, F. 2025. Integrasi Nilai karakter dalam Pendidikan Dasar Melalui Warisan Kata: Kato Nan Ampek. Embrio Pendidikan, 10(1), 1-16.

Zed, M. (2018). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.